<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: My 90 days on Low-Information Diet	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.codejourney.net/my-90-days-on-low-information-diet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.codejourney.net/my-90-days-on-low-information-diet/</link>
	<description>Become a better .NET full stack web developer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2018 11:57:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Dawid Sibiński		</title>
		<link>https://www.codejourney.net/my-90-days-on-low-information-diet/#comment-162</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dawid Sibiński]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2018 08:10:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.dsibinski.pl/?p=2839#comment-162</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.codejourney.net/my-90-days-on-low-information-diet/#comment-159&quot;&gt;Crizzyeyes&lt;/a&gt;.

Hey Crizzyeyes,
thanks for your insights.

&quot;What makes a person suited or unsuited for the diet?&quot;
I think it&#039;s mostly the environment in which a person operates. There are thousands of people who are simply interested in politics, news in general and they enjoy reading multiple news websites even to get various points of view. I don&#039;t, so I don&#039;t spend time on it. Everyone would probably have different &quot;diet&quot; depending on situation and point of view. I guess everyone is suited for such low-information diet, but defined differently and with different rules (everyone probably could spend his/her time more efficiently).

Regarding Twitter - maybe it will (or is already) becoming &quot;poisoned&quot;, but what I meant is that following hashtags on Twitter you can quickly see a lot of opinions (tweets have characters limit) so you can much quicker get a lot of different points of view. So even if some tweets are paid by TV/newspapers, you&#039;re able to quicker filter it out and form your own opinion on a particular topic.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.codejourney.net/my-90-days-on-low-information-diet/#comment-159">Crizzyeyes</a>.</p>
<p>Hey Crizzyeyes,<br />
thanks for your insights.</p>
<p>&#8220;What makes a person suited or unsuited for the diet?&#8221;<br />
I think it&#8217;s mostly the environment in which a person operates. There are thousands of people who are simply interested in politics, news in general and they enjoy reading multiple news websites even to get various points of view. I don&#8217;t, so I don&#8217;t spend time on it. Everyone would probably have different &#8220;diet&#8221; depending on situation and point of view. I guess everyone is suited for such low-information diet, but defined differently and with different rules (everyone probably could spend his/her time more efficiently).</p>
<p>Regarding Twitter &#8211; maybe it will (or is already) becoming &#8220;poisoned&#8221;, but what I meant is that following hashtags on Twitter you can quickly see a lot of opinions (tweets have characters limit) so you can much quicker get a lot of different points of view. So even if some tweets are paid by TV/newspapers, you&#8217;re able to quicker filter it out and form your own opinion on a particular topic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Dawid Sibiński		</title>
		<link>https://www.codejourney.net/my-90-days-on-low-information-diet/#comment-161</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dawid Sibiński]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2018 08:03:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.dsibinski.pl/?p=2839#comment-161</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.codejourney.net/my-90-days-on-low-information-diet/#comment-160&quot;&gt;Oleg Karasik&lt;/a&gt;.

Hey Oleg,
thanks for sharing this criteria, it&#039;s also a good approach :)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.codejourney.net/my-90-days-on-low-information-diet/#comment-160">Oleg Karasik</a>.</p>
<p>Hey Oleg,<br />
thanks for sharing this criteria, it&#8217;s also a good approach 🙂</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Oleg Karasik		</title>
		<link>https://www.codejourney.net/my-90-days-on-low-information-diet/#comment-160</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Oleg Karasik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2018 05:56:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.dsibinski.pl/?p=2839#comment-160</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&#062; The question I ask myself reviewing each page/person is: “Has any of this page’s/person’s posts really brought me any value during the previous month?” If the answer is “No” – I unfollow.

I use a slightly different criteria - whether value I get (valuable for me) from following this person is greater than amount of irrelevant (for me of course) stuff produced by the same person.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; The question I ask myself reviewing each page/person is: “Has any of this page’s/person’s posts really brought me any value during the previous month?” If the answer is “No” – I unfollow.</p>
<p>I use a slightly different criteria &#8211; whether value I get (valuable for me) from following this person is greater than amount of irrelevant (for me of course) stuff produced by the same person.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Crizzyeyes		</title>
		<link>https://www.codejourney.net/my-90-days-on-low-information-diet/#comment-159</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Crizzyeyes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2018 18:21:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.dsibinski.pl/?p=2839#comment-159</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;Instead of reading/watching news, I talk to people (at work or home) – as soon as something interesting or important happens in the world I got to know about it from them.&quot;

This strategy doesn&#039;t work if everyone were to follow your &quot;low information diet&quot; strategy, because no one would be reading the news. So clearly there is a need for an &quot;outsider person&quot; who does not follow this diet for this diet to work in the first place, which I find interesting. What makes a person suited or unsuited for the diet?

&quot;What’s more, Twitter provides more realistic information, in most cases published by people who are on-site when something happens, so it’s not poisoned or already influenced by public media.&quot;

I wouldn&#039;t count on this. I think it&#039;s a mistake to assume that this will continue to happen as-is. There is a lot of incentive for the &quot;public media&quot; to push back against this, and they have, in some ways. Eventually you may find yourself coming to trust a Twitter account, only to later find out that they were actually being paid off by the BBC for years, just for example.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Instead of reading/watching news, I talk to people (at work or home) – as soon as something interesting or important happens in the world I got to know about it from them.&#8221;</p>
<p>This strategy doesn&#8217;t work if everyone were to follow your &#8220;low information diet&#8221; strategy, because no one would be reading the news. So clearly there is a need for an &#8220;outsider person&#8221; who does not follow this diet for this diet to work in the first place, which I find interesting. What makes a person suited or unsuited for the diet?</p>
<p>&#8220;What’s more, Twitter provides more realistic information, in most cases published by people who are on-site when something happens, so it’s not poisoned or already influenced by public media.&#8221;</p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t count on this. I think it&#8217;s a mistake to assume that this will continue to happen as-is. There is a lot of incentive for the &#8220;public media&#8221; to push back against this, and they have, in some ways. Eventually you may find yourself coming to trust a Twitter account, only to later find out that they were actually being paid off by the BBC for years, just for example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
